top of page

The Changing Landscape: HR Meets Agentic AI

  • Writer: Khurram Rana
    Khurram Rana
  • 6 hours ago
  • 5 min read

Over the past few years I have watched the HR function in global tech companies evolve from handling administrative firefighting, compliance, and basic people‑process to being a strategic business partner, shaping human capital strategy, leadership, culture and change. At the same time, a new player is entering the stage: autonomous or semi‑autonomous AI agents, software entities capable of planning and executing tasks, interacting with people and systems, and increasingly blurring the line between tool and “digital colleague”. (HR Executive)

For HR professionals—especially in fast‑moving technology organizations operating across Pakistan, GCC, UK, US, China, Australia etc.—this raises a host of opportunities and challenges. Having sat at the region‑spanning CHRO table, I’d like to share what I see as the key issues and how HR must adapt.


Major Challenges for HR as AI Agents Arrive


1. Role Re‑definition: From Process Owner to Talent Architect

One of the biggest challenges is what happens to the HR role when agents take over large volumes of “routine” work: screening resumes, scheduling interviews, answering policy queries, even onboarding workflows. According to the consultancy PwC, AI agents can reduce human effort in HR by 40‑50 %. (PwC). This means HR professionals must shift from being process managers to being architects of talent, culture and capability. But that shift is non‑trivial in organisations where HR has been anchored in operational tasks.


Example: In a Pakistan‑based software services firm we had an HR team previously spending 60 % of time on queries, file‑work and scheduling. We piloted an agent to handle basic queries and saw freed‑up capacity—but then HR had to figure out what to do with that “extra” capacity: move it into strategic workforce planning, leadership development, culture initiatives. If you don’t define that, you risk having “idle” HR or worse: HR being overtaken entirely by technology.


2. Culture, Human‑Psychology and Trust

Agents bring speed, scalability and consistency—but they don’t automatically bring culture, human judgement, empathy, context. As one tech‑executive noted: “Making the agent smart isn’t the hard part — teaching it company culture is.” (Business Insider).

From an HR lens, that means we must ask: How does an agent reflect our values? How do people trust the agent? How do we maintain human‑connection and psychological safety when some of the human interaction is delegated to software?


Example: In our local and regional offices, we introduced a chatbot/agent pilot to answer benefit‑and‑leave queries. It was very efficient, but employees started saying “we just want to speak to a human”. We realised the agent’s responses lacked the nuance for cultural‐specific queries (for example local norms around Ramadan, regional holidays, cross‑border allowances) and employees felt less confident using it.

So HR intervened and is now working to build a “handover to human” path, ensuring regular audit of that agent’s responses by HR, and communicated clearly that the agent was a first touch, not a full replacement.


3. Governance, Ethics and Accountability

When an agent acts, who is responsible? What happens if the agent misinterprets data, makes a decision that affects someone’s career or pay, or causes bias? According to recent research, many HR leaders are still unclear about how to govern agentic AI in their domain. (HR Executive.

From an HR/legal/regulatory perspective, we must manage issues such as: data privacy (employee data across countries), non‑discrimination, transparency in decision‑making, audit trails, and the evolving regulatory environment in Pakistan, UK, USA, GCC, Australia etc.


Example: In Australia and UK, labour‑law frameworks emphasise transparency and non‑discrimination in hiring decisions. If an agent filters resumes or conducts initial screening, HR must ensure there is no hidden bias in the model (for example against gender, nationality, language). In Pakistan and the GCC, cultural sensitivities around data privacy and cross‑border data flows add another layer.

As HR leader I insisted on a “human‑in‑the‑loop” policy for any agent‑driven decision that impacts compensation, promotion or disciplinary action.


4. Integration & Skills: HR + IT + People

Another challenge: agents often live in the domain of technology and IT—but for HR to make full use of them, HR must partner closely with IT, data science, legal and operations. The traditional silo between HR and IT becomes a blocker. (Thomson Reuters). At the same time, HR professionals need new skills: understanding AI capabilities, structuring workflows for agents, interpreting analytics, managing vendor partnerships, training employees to collaborate with agents.


Example: In a UK‑based software firm, HR and IT were separate functions; when they introduced an agent for workforce‑planning analytics, data gaps and system incompatibilities slowed adoption. We then created a cross‑functional “People & Tech” committee (HR, IT, Data, Compliance) which met monthly and co‑owned the road map. HR team members received training in data literacy and vendor‑management. Without that, the agent became a fancy toy; with it, the agent began to deliver insights to leaders.


5. Employee Acceptance, Skill Gaps and Change Management

Deploying agents is not purely a technical roll‑out—it’s a human change management exercise. Some employees fear “robots replacing us”; others resist changing behaviour. In many regions I operate (Pakistan, GCC, Southeast Asia) the pace of digital maturity differs. HR must lead change: build communication, skill development, reassurance, define new roles, support mindset shift.

For example, a survey of L&D leaders in Asia and Middle East found 58 % saying skill‑gaps and AI adoption were their biggest challenge.



What HR Should Focus On: A Strategic Agenda

Given these challenges, here is a strategic agenda I recommend for HR leaders in the global tech industry:


  1. Define the “Why” and the Human‑Anchor.


    Before deploying an agent, clarify what you want HR to become: e.g., shifting from operations to strategy; enabling leaders; building culture. Position the agent as an augmentation to human capability, not a replacement.

  2. Governance & Ethics Protocols.


    Develop policies: which decisions agents may make, which require human oversight; data ownership; bias audits; transparency to employees. For example, in Pakistan & GCC ensure local labour‑law compliance and data‑sovereignty.

  3. Capability Building & Collaboration across HR‑IT‑Data.


    HR teams need training in AI literacy, vendor/contract management, analytics. Create cross‑functional governance teams. Integrate the agent into workflows—not bolt it on.

  4. Change Management & Employee Engagement.


    Communicate clearly. Involve stakeholders—from managers to frontline teams. Use pilot programmes to build trust. Recognise that in many regions, digital literacy or cultural norms may require more time.

  5. Measure & Iterate.


    Set clear KPIs: e.g., reduction in turnaround time, improved employee satisfaction, shift of HR time to strategic tasks. Monitor for unintended consequences: bias, over‑dependence, skill atrophy. For example research warns of “cognitive depletion” if humans rely too heavily on agents. (Thomson Reuters)

  6. Human‑Agent Teaming Mindset.


    Think of agents as teammates—not tools. As some academic research shows, effective human‑AI teaming demands shared mental models, coordination, training and maintenance. (arXiv)


    For example, equip HR with guidelines: when the agent handles a query, when it escalates, how humans review outcomes, how feedback loops are built.



In the global tech HR world, the arrival of agentic AI is less a question of if and more when and how.


For professionals operating across Pakistan, US, UK, GCC, Southeast Asia and Australia, the stakes are high: we must navigate not only technology but culture, regulation, human psychology and strategic transformation.


The challenge is real: agents threaten inertia, weak governance, unclear roles and change‑resistance. But the opportunity is even greater. HR functions that embrace this moment can shift from being service providers to strategic talent architects—shaping leadership, engagement, culture and organisational agility.


As I always remind my HR teams: technology will not replace HR. But HR that harnesses technology wisely can replace HR that treats itself as purely administrative.


ree

The future of our profession is not automation of HR, but evolution of HR—with human insight and technological enablement working hand in hand.


If you’re running HR in a

tech or global company, I encourage you to ask:

  • Are we clear about what 'human work' we want to keep, what we want the agent to handle?

  • Have we built governance, training and change‑management around it?

  • Are we ready to evolve our role and our teams into the “people + agent” era?


Because the best outcomes won’t come from ignoring AI agents—they’ll come from integrating them, thoughtfully, ethically and strategically.

 

 
 
 

1 Comment


Shahroz Shahroz
Shahroz Shahroz
2 hours ago

Really insightful read. The shift from traditional HR to “people + agent” collaboration is spot on. I like how you’ve highlighted the cultural and psychological aspects — that’s where most organizations struggle while adopting AI. It’s not just tech transformation, it’s mindset transformation.

Edited
Like
bottom of page
Khurram Rana